Starkhound · Intelligence for cybersecurity decision-making
Home Risk & decision Vulnerability Management Risk Management CTEM Decision Intelligence Compliance Operations Reporting Red Team Threat intelligence Artificial Intelligence Who it's for Security teams Service providers Security Integrations Pricing Español

Intelligence for cybersecurity decision-making.

Starkhound takes every technical finding all the way to the leadership decision: why it matters, what it exposes the organisation to and what has been decided, with full traceability at every step.

MITRE ATT&CK v19Active exploitation, checked dailyData isolated per organisation
  1. 1Initial access
  2. 2Valid accounts
  3. 3Lateral movement
  4. 4Process affected

ReadsTests, scanners and assets
Cross-checksExploitation, ATT&CK and processes
DecidesFix, plan or accept
Follows upTicket, deadline and retest
From finding to decision

One path between a test and a decision.

Every finding goes through the same five steps, always in the same order. What comes out at the end can be defended before management and before an auditor.

Path of a decisionOne finding through the model
01Input

Finding

From a pentest, a scanner or an import, with its evidence.

PentestScannerImport
02Context

Asset and process

Which system it is, what it is worth and which business process stops if it falls.

Criticality€ / day
03Starkhound model

Real threat

Is it exploited today? Does it open an attack path? Would the defence see it?

ExploitationATT&CKPath
04Output

Decision

Fix, plan or accept, with the reason in writing.

DeadlineReason
05Close

Follow-up

Ticket in the team's own tool and a retest once fixed.

TicketDeadlineRetest
UsesFindings, assets, processes and public catalogues
ReturnsDecision, deadline, reason and evidence
NeverGuesses a technique nobody declared
Why a score is not enough

Priority comes from the data, not from the score.

A score says how serious something could be. A decision needs to know whether it is exploited, where an attacker would get in and what stops if they do.

See Decision Intelligence
01

Real exploitation, not theoretical

What is already being exploited in real attacks is flagged automatically, and its deadline is watched daily.

Active exploitation · deadlines
02

Declared attack paths

ATT&CK techniques are declared by the team that ran the test. The chain is built from what was demonstrated, never from assumptions.

ATT&CK v19 · chain
03

Money at risk per day

Every asset is linked to a business process with its downtime cost. Exposure reads in euros, not in colours.

Critical processes · €
04

A decision that can be defended

Every decision keeps its reason and its evidence. Management understands the risk and audit sees the trail.

Reason · evidence · trail
For management

From finding to business, in euros.

Where the risk flows: from the severity of each finding to the declared attack tactic and on to the process that stops. Hover over a block to see its path.

Illustrative example with demo data.

Security of the product itself

A cybersecurity product, being its own first client

Data isolated per organisation

Each company that subscribes to Starkhound has its own database, on European infrastructure.

Scoped access

Permissions by scope, two-factor authentication and corporate single sign-on. Each organisation's portal starts closed until the team opens it.

Audit log

Who did what, on which finding and when.

Continuous review

Automated tests on every code change, client isolation included; dependencies reviewed every week.

A demo on the organisation's own case

With its own findings and way of working, not with sample data.